Lee Wochner: Writer. Director. Writing instructor. Thinker about things.


Blog

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Heavy reading

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

obamatheman.jpg

Here’s one of the featured books in the window of the bookstore at Los Angeles International Airport. Nice to know we’re peddling this to the world. The most chilling aspect is the top line. It’s hard to believe that the people who buy this book can read. But maybe it’s purely ornamental. “Look what we have on our coffee table:  The TRUTH.” Because, you know, I’m sure that the recognized leader of the free world, the head of the world’s most powerful nation, a man who came from extremely humble origins and rose to the highest station achievable, is eagerly working in secret to advance someone else’s agenda. Yes, that’s how egoless someone who is that driven must be.

Further proof of Sir Ian’s fabulousness

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

We’ve written here before about our enjoyment of Sir Ian McKellen. Here’s a photo of his participation in the recent protest against the Pope. (To quote a gay friend of mine, “Just say nope.”)

gandalfmagneto.jpg

By the way, posting this image earlier a little bit ago on my Facebook page resulted in the following dialogue with a Facebook friend (whom I actually know but haven’t seen in… 10 years?). This little exchange really shows how issues of sexuality, politics, and Sir Ian McKellen, all intersect over the all-important topic of Marvel Comics.

  • LEE:  Mind you, I had my doubts about Gandalf, but I did not realize that Magneto was gay. What about his two children, Wanda (The Scarlet Witch) and Pietro (Quicksilver)? Which brings us to the question of “how exactly do you define ‘gay’?” At least with regard to Marvel comics characters. By the way, Magneto himself is confused — 40 years as a villain, but with recurring stints as a hero. What’s up with that?

  • FB FRIEND: And ‘Scarlet Witch’ married an android — what do we call THAT orientation?

  • LEE: And then they had “children” who, it later turned out, where magical constructs who destabilized the entire Marvel universe. Things were so much simpler when relationships were between one human and another. Now you’ve got mutants and androids and magicians and supervillains. And whatever The Beast is, what with the blue fur and flews and all.

  • FB FRIEND: I didn’t know that about their kids. (Sorta wondered how they could…you know.)

  • OTHER FB FRIEND (whom I also haven’t seen in at least 10 years, and probably more like 15): I think he is saying he is both Gay (Gandolph) and Straight (Magne to),,,right?

  • FB FRIEND: I want to go on record, though, in supporting equal marriage rights for mutants, androids, Inhumans, aliens, cyborgs, wizards, ghosts, angels, demons, demigods, elementals, monsters, talking animals, and humans exposed to radiation (that somehow made them stronger, faster and better looking).

  • LEE: What kicked off Avengers Disassembled was the Scarlet Witch’s discovery that her “children” were magical constructs accidentally created by her chaos magic. From there, things got worse: She wished into existence the notion of “No More Mutants,” which recast the entire universe into one without mutants. When the “real” Marvel Universe was finally reconstituted, most of the mutants were gone, and no new mutants were being born — a problem that has bedeviled them since. Recently, the first new mutant, named, of course, Hope, and related, of course, to Scott Summers (as, seemingly, all red-haired women in the Marvel Universe are), was born. Once you put it all down in writing as I just did, it’s easy to understand, though it does give succor to the notion of certain Evangelists and U.S. Senators that mutants and androids should not procreate. (Lest we all wind up in an alternate universe. Which seems like a danger we’d all want to avoid. Unless we’re working a dead-end job at 7-11.)

  • FB FRIEND: Yeah, “Disassembled”, “House of M”, “Civil War”… Ya notice that all the major trouble used to come from the bad guys, but now it’s mostly traditional heroes causing all the strife? Is this meant to mirror the divisions in our own “real” universe?! Hmmm… The Republican party IS disassembling itself, and the Scarlet Palin’s ‘House of Tea’ is taking over. Whoa! I need to get current in my comic reading! I believe ‘Daredevil’ is the heavy now? Who could he represent? Maybe Rahm Emanuel quitting the White House to run Chicago. Yeah…I see it now…

  • LEE: You are mostly right, although we should remember that the Skrulls were stirring up trouble as part of their Secret Invasion. Re Daredevil, he is some combination of the Tea Party, the Minutemen, and U.S. black ops — he’s lost all faith in the system and has now built his own Guantanamo Bay beneath the streets of Hells Kitchen. He’s also running The Hand, but in the belief that he’s using them as a force for good. And he’s switched his costume color to black — need we say more?

No bid

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Here’s someone else who’s not buying Meg Whiman’s bid for governor of California:  the founder of EBay, who hired her to run the company.

In fairness, he notes that she was “a fantastic executive” while at EBay. But how that translates to running the state of California remains to be seen.

(Un)fair and (im)balanced

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Fox “News” playing tricks with editing. Again.

Stumped speech

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Every politician running for office should watch this video. It provides a primer in what not to do. The rest of us will find it equal parts hilarious and terrifying.

Another reason presidents shouldn’t lie

Monday, September 13th, 2010

Because 15 years later, Jerry Brown will still be making fun of you for it.

A reminder for Democrats this election season

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

“If you give people a choice between a Republican and a Republican, they’ll pick the Republican every time.” Harry Truman

Tarnish in the Golden State

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

How bad (and badly managed) is the California economy? So bad that the UCLA Anderson School of Management is preparing to give back about $18 million in state funding because they’d rather take their chances getting more donations and raising tuition than counting on the state to actually supply the money budgeted to them. Any time any institution says it would rather give back $18 million, you have to figure they’ve done the calculation and figured it just wasn’t worth taking.

As somebody who has sat on the local school district’s budget committee for two years, I get it. What the state promises to pay the schools is a guess at best and a crime at worst. It’s the equivalent of the classic parental response to a child’s request:  “maybe later.” I used to think that the schools in my state were over-funded. (And actually, that’s a suspicion I still harbor.) But one thing I’ve learned for sure:  they are erratically funded. Money promised in September arrives in, say, February, and it’s never the full amount. Once I got an up-close look at our district’s financials I discovered two things, the first being that the financial model made absolutely no sense. The second thing I learned was this:  that every year, for at least the past 13 years, our budget had been cut. Why do we suffer teacher layoffs,  class-size increases, broken playground pavement, reduced programs (a music teacher who comes in only once every two weeks; a gravely reduced Gifted and Talented Education program; fewer field trips; fewer counselors; and so forth) and more, when theoretically the schools are allocated 40% of the state’s revenues and the state had several very healthy years in that time frame? Partly it’s because the state “borrows” this money, with promises to pay it back later. Partly it’s because… I just don’t know.

A few of us around here have come up with our own solution, and it somewhat mirrors what the Anderson School is proposing. Although we have no intention of suggesting giving back $18 million in funding (if we could even get it), we proposed some ideas to bring in our own funding for our schools, funding that each school could control and allocate on its own.  Is that an ideal solution? No — imagine the impact on schools in poor neighborhoods if every school across the U.S. counted on local funding. But for Burbank it’s a good start, and it’s better than hoping that the state will get its act together. Because, as they say, hope is not a plan.

Tea service

Monday, August 30th, 2010

Who’s funding the “populist” Tea Party? Billionaires.

How to tell a closet case

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

Few people are more miserable than closet cases. My gay friends told me this years ago, and it seems truer and truer. Case in point:  Bush campaign chief Ken Mehlman who has now announced that he’s gay. Evidently, he’s only recently come to this conclusion, and now must bear the agony of helping Karl Rove fan the flames of homophobia for fun and profit. In previous off-the-record interviews, it’s revealed that Mehlman “often wondered why gay voters never formed common cause with Republican opponents of Islamic jihad, which he called ‘the greatest anti-gay force in the world right now.'” Theory for you Ken:  Maybe it was all the hatred you and your pals were stirring up against, well, your own kind.

Not sure how to spot closeted gays? I understand. I have poor gaydar. I’m someone who’s still unsure that all the guys on “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” were gay. Sure, they were knowledgeable about hair products and where the couch should go, but that doesn’t always translate into “gay.” But now I’ve locked into one surefire tell-tale clue. You should just assume that any Republican opposed to gays and gay marriage is himself a self-loathing closeted gay person. That would explain Congressman Mark Foley, Ken Mehlman, Senator Larry Craig, Pastor Ted Haggard, Congressman Bob Allen, California State Senator Roy Ashburn and so many others. Now I understand whom they hate, and why.