Lee Wochner: Writer. Director. Writing instructor. Thinker about things.


Blog

Archive for the ‘Thoughts’ Category

Brief (but wrong)

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

The simplification movement has given us advice like this:

The Problem

E-mail takes too long to respond to, resulting in continuous inbox overflow for those who receive a lot of it.

The Solution

Treat all email responses like SMS text messages, using a set number of letters per response. Since it’s too hard to count letters, we count sentences instead.

two.sentenc.es is a personal policy that all email responses regardless of recipient or subject will be two sentences or less. It’s that simple.

That’s potentially great. It’s also potentially disastrous. English, like most languages, requires nuance. If your email message is regarding something more elaborate than, say, “Good. See you there,” it’s not  done well in two sentences. Moreover, writing well while writing short is difficult — in many cases, it would take you more time to answer shorter.

I also can’t help pointing out that this bit of communications advice commits an error:  They mean to say “two sentences or fewer,” not “less.” If you’re going to be brief, at least be right.

Getting rich by getting elected

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

My friend Doug Hackney digs through the finances of retiring Congressmen and finds that it wasn’t just AIG and Goldman Sachs who got enriched by the government.

Worth reading

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

How Twitter is starting to scare the pants off everyone who does customer service — to your benefit.

Thought for today

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Maybe there’s a reason they’re called killer whales.

Happy Birthday, Steve Jobs

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

In honor of your 55th birthday, here’s a loving tribute from another cultural icon.

More women going down

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

The Pentagon is moving to allow women to serve on Navy submarines. Here’s the story.

A lesson in economics

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

My friend Barry sent me this. (Not the Barry who broke his leg. The Barry who lost his leg. What is it with Barrys and legs?) Unfortunately, it explains everything.

USA Finance 101– How Our Finances got so Fouled Up!

An Easily Understandable Explanation of Derivative Markets

Heidi is the proprietor of a bar in Detroit. She realizes
that virtually all of her customers are unemployed
alcoholics and, as such, can no longer afford to patronize
her bar. To solve this problem, she comes up with a new
marketing plan that allows her customers to drink now, but
pay later.

She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby
granting the customers loans).

Word gets around about Heidi’s “drink now, pay later”
marketing strategy and, as a result, increasing numbers of
customers flood into Heidi’s bar. Soon she has the largest
sales volume for any bar in Detroit.

By providing her customers’ freedom from immediate payment
demands, Heidi gets no resistance when, at regular
intervals, she substantially increases her prices for wine
and beer, the most consumed beverages. Consequently, Heidi’s
gross sales volume increases massively.

A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank
recognizes that these customer debts constitute valuable
future assets and increases Heidi’s borrowing limit. He sees
no reason for any undue concern, since he has the debts of
the unemployed alcoholics as collateral.

At the bank’s corporate headquarters, expert traders
transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS
and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then bundled and traded
on international security markets. Naive investors don’t
really understand that the securities being sold to them as
AAA secured bonds are really the debts of unemployed
alcoholics.

Nevertheless, the bond prices continuously climb, and the
securities soon become the hottest-selling items for some of
the nation’s leading brokerage houses.

One day, even though the bond prices are still climbing, a
risk manager at the original local bank decides that the
time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the
drinkers at Heidi’s bar. He so informs Heidi.

Heidi then demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but
being unemployed alcoholics they cannot pay back their
drinking debts. Since Heidi cannot fulfill her loan
obligations she is forced into bankruptcy. The bar closes
and the eleven employees lose their jobs.

Overnight, DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS drop in price
by 90%. The collapsed bond asset value destroys the banks
liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans, thus
freezing credit and economic activity in the community.

The suppliers of Heidi’s bar had granted her generous
payment extensions and had invested their firms’ pension
funds in the various BOND securities. They find they are now
faced with having to write off her bad debt and with losing
over 90% of the presumed value of the bonds. Her wine
supplier also claims bankruptcy, closing the doors on a
family business that had endured for three generations, her
beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately
closes the local plant and lays off 150 workers.

Fortunately though, the bank, the brokerage houses and their
respective executives are saved and bailed out by a multi-
billion dollar no-strings attached cash infusion from the
Government. The funds required for this bailout are obtained
by new taxes levied on employed, middle-class, non-alcoholics.

Now, do you understand ?

Phish story

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Fifteen minutes ago, I got this email from a playwright friend:

I’m sorry for this odd request because it might get to you too urgent but it’s because of the situation of things right now,I’m stuck in United Kingdom with family right now,we came down here on vacation ,we were robbed, worse of it was that our bags, cash and credit cards were stolen of us at GUN POINT, it’s such a crazy experience for us, we need help flying back home, the authorities are not being 100% supportive but the good thing is that we still have our passports but don’t have enough money to get our flight ticket back home, please i need you to loan me some money, i will refund you as soon as I’m back home, i promise.

I emailed back:

John,

Is this for real? I’m going to message you through Facebook as well.

Lee

And so I did:

John, I got this email from you. Is this for real, or is this a phishing expedition?

Three minutes later, I got this reply:

No!!!lt isn’t a virus, I’m in this situation for real, I’ve been finding it difficult to make overseas calls from here. My phone’s out of service, probably because I’m outside the states. It has really been embarrassing for me,I’m very sorry for not informing you about our trip to U.K but I’m sure i can explain better when i return,I need some $$ as I have nothing on me now, was wondering if you could loan me $1,980, I’ll refund it to you as soon as I arrive home i will be glad to read from you soon.

John

And I got a Facebook chat message, “Hey Lee. You there?”

But I had already responded to the previous FB message with this:

What’s the name of the dvd you gave me? What happens to the lead character?

When I got no response to that, I messaged back: “Thought so. Contacting Facebook now.”

And I called my friend on his home phone back here in Los Angeles — and he answered. Right away. Why was he up? Because other friends who’d gotten that email called him to check. It’s 6:46 a.m. here and I doubt he would have been up otherwise.

Needless to say, he wasn’t robbed at gunpoint in the UK, and if he had been, a call to American Express or the U.S. Consulate or his bank or any number of other authorities would have loosened up some of his cash. I also let him know over the phone that if he had really been in a jackpot, I would have wired him the money. One of the things that made the phishing expedition so believable was the reasonable amount of cash requested.

What tipped me off that it wasn’t him? It’s not just the idea that John would have to inform me in advance that he was going to London (why would he have to do that?). It was the writing in the last sentence:  “It has really been embarrassing for me,I’m very sorry for not informing you about our trip to U.K but I’m sure i can explain better when i return,I need some $$ as I have nothing on me now, was wondering if you could loan me $1,980, I’ll refund it to you as soon as I arrive home i will be glad to read from you soon.” I think John would sooner shoot himself in the head than leave those personal pronouns uncapitalized, or write a run-on sentence fragment like that.

It comes in handy to know your friend’s writing voice.

The Tiger Woods decision tree

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

On Friday, I saw Tiger Woods’ apology-of-sorts on a screen at a bar in Ft. Lauderdale. He pleaded for people to leave his family alone. Immediately afterward, his plea was analyzed by four experts trying to get at the root meaning of what he’d been saying. After that, more people analyzed it for our benefit.

I didn’t feel that I needed the apology, such as it was, anyway. What had he done to me? Nothing. Same as he had ever done.

But what if, unlike me, you’ve actually had close personal contact with Tiger Woods. Perhaps you think you’re owed an apology, but you’re not sure. For you, there’s this helpful chart, courtesy of Brokey McPoverty:

tigerchart.jpg

Uh oh

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

No, I don’t know why all the paragraph returns have suddenly vanished from this blog.

But I’m going to get to the bottom of this.

(By asking people smarter than me to please get to the bottom of this.)