The horror this time
For 20 years now, I’ve taught a private playwriting workshop on Saturday mornings. Occasionally, someone will wander in unannounced off the street — sometimes it’s someone in the wrong place, sometimes it’s someone who’s early for whatever is following me, and sometimes, just sometimes, it’s a strange person off the street, in which case I have to deal with ousting them, sometimes physically. This has happened only twice at this location, and once at a theatre in West LA where I was once involved. This past Saturday, someone came in and sat down and wouldn’t leave, and at first I thought this was another of those situations — only, thankfully, to realize my error, apologize deeply, and invite the person to stay. (I had sent him the wrong email, and so he thought he’d been invited.) With a little time, the situation was calmed and we all returned to the work at hand.
Then I got into my car and heard about the Tucson shootings. Which had me wondering: What if the visitor to my workshop had indeed been deranged, as I mistakenly thought so at first? And how lucky had I been in dealing with actual lunatics previously?
I don’t have any great platform that I seek to mount on this issue, and I haven’t figure out anything more than anyone else has. What I have done, though, is collect some thoughts over the past five days:
- While lunatics are predisposed to do whatever it is they’re going to do, the recent atmosphere of political hate speech is unlike anything I’ve seen in my lifetime, and is no doubt further firing them up. I didn’t like what I saw at the health-care rally I attended two years ago: lots of deep, menacing anger. I was genuinely worried for Congressman Adam Schiff, and couldn’t help wondering what he’d done to deserve this. The same went for President Obama, but he wasn’t there, while Schiff was.
- At the same time, I think it’s a very very very bad idea to try to legislate away free speech, as this Democratic congressman is proposing.
- I know it’s a cliche, but I have to say it: I grew up shooting guns, and I never shot anyone. Neither did my father, or my his friends, or his friends’ kids, or my brother-in-law, or my nephew, or my nephew-in-law, or my son, or my other son, or anyone else I know. We should enforce the gun laws we have (and it sounds like Jared Loughner slipped through the cracks, in yet another instance). And we should restrict semi-automatic and automatic weapons. But further restrictions on guns overall? It’s not going to happen, and I’m not sure it should. If I hit you with my car, you aren’t going to restrict everyone else’s access to a car.
- Six people were killed, including the 9-year-old girl (and I cannot imagine what her parents are feeling about this), and a score of people were injured. Who wasn’t injured? Sarah Palin. Someone should tell her. Her self-serving sanctimonious defense is nauseating.
- Someone who is going to take a hit politically: Republicans. However you feel about that, bet on it, at least in the short term. This is why they delayed the phony “repeal” vote of the Affordable Care Act. Republicans didn’t create the Tea Party, and so far the Tea Party includes only one crazed gun nut, and it’s always unfair to judge a mass movement by the actions of one lone person. But perceptions become reality, and the Republicans themselves are concerned that they can’t control Tea Party activists. Which is why some Republicans are leaving the party rather than face them.
- We would all be better off if we’d just tone it down.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:24 am
Ah, the rhetorric….
What occurred to me Saturday was something I heard on NPR Friday when 2 conservative poundits wrre proclaiming the imminent demise of the “Democrat” party. They got the whole hour, and seemed carefully rehearsed; they frequently referred to “Obama-Care”, never once calling it the Health Care Reform Act.
A small thing, but it seemed SO un-spontaneous!
January 15th, 2011 at 1:43 pm
Dan, remember that the next time someone refers to them as “teabaggers” instead of “Tea Party. Cuts both ways.
Sarah Palin didn’t insert herself into the dialogue until Thursday, after others had accused her of instigating or encouraging this insane behavior. This guy, according to friends, had no interest in politics. All of these allegations were baseless, but I guess the left is frightened of her for some reason, so they’ll blame her for anything to make her look bad.
I agree with you, Lee, about the guns. But the legislators have to look concerned and compassionate, so they’ll pass another ill-advised, vague sounding piece of legislation.
He fell thru the cracks, as you said. We stop most of them, but every so often one gets past all law enforcement and social services. Let’s stop blaming everybody else. He is responsible for his own actions. Well, he and Lee Wochner.
January 17th, 2011 at 9:09 pm
[…] I predicted further fallout, at least short-term, for the Republicans from the Arizona shootings. (Even though — let’s be clear — they aren’t the ones who showed up and sprayed the crowd with bullets.) So here’s the latest: Speaker Boehner is backing off referring to HR2, the pointless and doomed vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act, as the “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act.” In place of “job-killing,” he’s tried out “job-destroying” and “job-crushing.” “Maiming” is no doubt far behind. […]