Down for the count
I don’t remember the U.S. Census being so openly reviled in the past, but now it seems that no matter where you stand politically, if you fill out your census form it’s like you’re obliging a government conspiracy.
Last week I was visiting a gay couple when the one partner got a call from a gay friend distraught about some series of questions on the census, and my friend was telling him, “No. NO. They do NOT need to know these things about you!” It sounded like a fear of the government knowing you’re gay — even though everyone else in your very gay neighborhood knows. Not being in the situation, I’m not one to judge.
Someone else I know gave this response to “the asinine race question”: She checked off the box “Some other race” and then wrote in “Lightly tanned.” Granted, once upon a time a lot of people didn’t fit into that form at all (including my friends who are what was once called “mulatto”). But now there are more racial options on that form than ever before. I understand the resistance: I don’t like being categorized either. Some people claim that if “communities” are under-represented, then there are fewer programs directed to them. Maybe. But starting with my college applications I always checked “Native American” — after all, I was born in New Jersey — and I never got a single grant or scholarship.
March 25th, 2010 at 9:50 am
Walt Kelley put it most succintly (as usual fopr him) 50 years ago: “We’ve taken leave of our census.”
March 27th, 2010 at 3:41 pm
There are a total of six mailings from the Census folks this time around. We had an article in the postal magazine listing them all, which I cut out and posted on our union bullitan board at work. The final two are in early April. This is the third Census I’ve delivered and — I hope — my last. Mail them back, folks — we need the work.