According to a report released today by the National Endowment for the Arts, reading in the U.S. is in steep decline. Here’s the story from AP:

A growing crisis in American literacy 

Fewers adults than ever report reading even one book a year, says disturbing new NEA report.

By Hillel Italie, Associated Press
November 19, 2007

NEW YORK — The latest National Endowment for the Arts report draws on a variety of sources, public and private, and essentially reaches one conclusion: Americans are reading less.

The study, “To Read or Not Read,” is being released today as a follow-up to a 2004 NEA survey, “Reading at Risk,” that found an increasing number of adult Americans were not even reading one book a year.

“To Read or Not to Read” gathers an array of government, academic and foundation data on everything from how many 9-year-olds read every day for “fun” (54%) to the percentage of high school graduates deemed by employers as “deficient” in writing in English (72%).

“I’ve done a lot of work in statistics in my career and I’ve never seen a situation where so much data was pulled from so many places and absolutely everything is so consistent,” NEA Chairman Dana Gioia said.

Among the findings in the 99-page study:

* In 2002, only 52% of Americans ages 18 to 24, the college years, read a book voluntarily, down from 59% in 1992.

* Money spent on books, after being adjusted for inflation, dropped 14% from 1985 to 2005 and has fallen dramatically since the mid-1990s.

* The number of adults possessing bachelor’s degrees and “proficient in reading prose” dropped from 40% in 1992 to 31% in 2003.

An age gap

Some of the news is good, notably among 9-year-olds, whose reading comprehension scores have soared since the early 1990s. But at the same time, the number of 17-year-olds who “never or hardly ever” read for pleasure has doubled, to 19%, and their comprehension scores have fallen.

“I think there’s been an enormous investment in teaching kids to read in elementary school,” Gioia said. “Kids are doing better at 9 and at 11. At 13, they’re doing no worse, but then you see his catastrophic falloff. . . . If kids are put into this electronic culture without any counterbalancing efforts, they will stop reading.”

Publishers and booksellers have noted that teen fiction is a rapidly expanding category in an otherwise flat market, but the NEA’s director of research, Sunil Iyengar, wondered how much of that growth has been caused by the Harry Potter books, the last of which came out in July.

“It’s great that millions of kids are reading these long, intricate novels, but reading one such book every 18 months doesn’t make up for daily reading,” Gioia said.

Doug Whiteman, president of the Penguin Young Readers Group, a division of Penguin Group (USA), said sales of teen books were the strongest part of his business.

But he added that a couple of factors could explain why scores were dropping: Adults are also buying the Potter books, thus making the teen market seem bigger on paper, and some sales are for non-English-language books.

“There are so many nuances,” Whiteman said. “Reading scores don’t necessarily have any relevance to today’s sales.”

The head of Simon & Schuster’s children’s publishing division, Rick Richter, saw another reason why sales could rise even as scores go down: A growing gap between those who read and those who don’t.

Richter considers it “very possible” that the market is driven by a relatively small number of young people who buy large numbers of books. Test scores, meanwhile, are lowered by the larger population of teens who don’t read. “A divide like that is really a cause for concern,” Richter said.

The report emphasizes the social benefits of reading: “Literary readers” are more likely to exercise, visit art museums, keep up with current events, vote in presidential elections and perform volunteer work.

“This should explode the notion that reading is somehow a passive activity,” Gioia said. “Reading creates people who are more active by any measure. . . . People who don’t read, who spend more of their time watching TV or on the Internet, playing video games, seem to be significantly more passive.”

Sounding the alarm

Gioia called the decline in reading “perhaps the most important socioeconomic issue in the United States” and called for changes “in the way we’re educating kids, especially in high school and college.”

“We need to reconnect reading with pleasure and enlightenment,” he said.

” ‘To Read or Not Read’ suggests we are losing the majority of the new generation,” Gioia added. “The majority of young Americans will not realize their individual, economic or social potential.”

I read this — no pun intended — and thought, I’m not sure. In some of the disciplines I follow, such as poetry and comic books, reading is dramatically up. Given that more and more people have direct access to the internet and probably check out news sites while they’re there, I think news reading may be up as well. (Although newspaper reading is no doubt shrinking.) And I also couldn’t help bearing in mind that Chaucer had nine readers in his lifetime, all of them at court, so we’re certainly in better shape than that. And, if we’re counting raw numbers, given the explosion in population (200 million Americans when I was a boy; 260 million now), that certainly equals a net growth in readers. Finally, given that almost everyone in the known universe is writing a memoir or self-help book of some sort, they must be able to read. I say all this while maintaining my enormous respect for NEA Chair Gioia, whose goals are laudable.

Then I used the internet — and my reading skills — to locate this piece in the New York Times, which quotes a USC colleague who has similar reservations:

The new report is likely to provoke as much debate as the previous one. Stephen Krashen, a professor emeritus of education at the University of Southern California, said that based on his analysis of other data, reading was not on the decline. He added that the endowment appeared to be exaggerating the decline in reading scores and said that according to federal education statistics, the bulk of decreases in 12th-grade reading scores had occurred in the early 1990s, and that compared with 1994 average reading scores in 2005 were only one point lower.

Something I remember from my childhood in the 1970’s was a widespread sense that children of the time were somehow dumber than our predecessors. (This is somewhat akin to the death of the theatre, which has been happening for 2000 years. Los Angeles has, at last count, 400 theatres.) I look at the astonishing proficiency in new technologies of so much of this generation and I wonder if our assumptions don’t keep us from recognizing these new achievements because they don’t correlate with past experience.

Whatever shape books come in, reading will continue. So will the emergence of new technologies and new storytelling mechanisms. I pledge to you that “Marvel Ultimate Alliance” on Xbox 360 is in some ways an amazing storytelling experience. Yes, the plotlines and characterization are crude, but this is only the start. In the new era — as we also saw foreshadowed in “Myst” and in Dick’s “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch” — we will be inside the story. Will this new fiction necessarily be a lesser achievement than, say, Tolstoy’s? Or will we understand that embracing the possibilities of the new forms does not mean that we cannot continue our appreciation of Tolstoy and Chaucer?

Until that day, because of the poor track record of doomsayers, I remain suspicious of “decline and fall” theories.
—————-
Now playing: Pere Ubu – The Book Is On The Table
via FoxyTunes

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 20th, 2007 at 12:47 am and is filed under On reading, Thoughts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.