Casino Royale, no cheese
I haven’t been a fan of the Bond franchise since… well, I remember hating “Moonraker.” That was in 1979.
“Moonraker” typifies what disinterested me in Bond: the detached gimmickry of an outerspace conflict. It was an extraterrestrial epic in which nothing was grounded.
Much has happened in the series since then, not much of it good. Until now.
It is not just that the new Bond himself is a rehumanized model, although that goes a long way. The gadgets are gone. (This Bond’s most essential spyware? A defibrilator.) Minus the fantastic, something closer to reality reappears. That’s a good thing. While I don’t want my secret agents settling down in the suburbs, I do like to know that they can get cut and bleed and feel betrayed and heartbroken and be driven by ego and rage.
Best Bond yet? It sure felt that way today.
November 24th, 2006 at 9:02 pm
I don’t think you can count Moonraker as a true James Bond movie. No with Roger Moore a sorry spoof of a character.
My name is Simmons. Grant Simmons.
November 24th, 2006 at 9:02 pm
*Not*
November 24th, 2006 at 10:17 pm
I haven’t seen any of the Bond films in a long time, but I remember as a kid thinking that Roger Moore was ridiculous. Apparently, Ian Fleming was crazy about him — absolutely loved him in the role.
December 12th, 2006 at 5:19 pm
I finally got to see Casino Royale. David Niven is an interesting choice as James Bond. Woody Allen is very funny. I predict big things for this young man. Not sure about the fat guy who played the bad guy. Is he new to movies? And the babes? Shag-O-Mite!!!